Defendant appealed the decision of the trial judge sustaining the violation of R.I.G.L. 1956 § 31-27-2.1 (refusal to submit to chemical test). The Court held that the plain and clear language of R.I.G.L. § 31-27-2.1 permits the trial judge to impose a penalty of a ten month license suspension. Since the sentence imposed is within the statutory requirements the sentence does not constitute an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, the violation was sustained.