Defendant appealed the decision of the Appeals Panel sustaining the violation of R.I.G.L. 1956 § 31-27-2.1 (refusal to submit).  Defendant claimed that she was not properly identified as the operator of the vehicle.  The District Court held that the defendant was identified by the officer of the vehicle and the defendant admitted that she was driving the vehicle.  Accordingly, the Court held that the trial magistrate did not err and sustained the violation against the defendant.