RI District Court and Traffic Tribunal Case Law

This website is in no way affiliated with, sponsored by, or supported by the Rhode Island Judiciary, the Rhode Island District Court, or Rhode Island Traffic Tribunal.

State of Rhode Island v. Jason Kilsey, C.A. No. T13-0056 (March 3, 2014)

State of Rhode Island v. Jason Kilsey, C.A. No. T13-0056 (March 3, 2014).pdf
Appeals Panel
03/03/2014
State of Rhode Island v. Jason Kilsey, C.A. No. T13-0056 Text Messaging While Driving

Text Messaging While Driving

Defendant appealed the trial judge’s decision to sustain the charged violation of G.L. 1956 § 31-22-30, “Text Messaging While Operating a Motor Vehicle.”  Defendant claimed that the trial judge’s decision to sustain the charge was in violation of the statutory provisions.  Specifically, defendant produced records of his text messages which showed no texts sent or received within the timeframe of the alleged violation.  The Panel reviewed the plain language of the statute, which states that “[n]o person shall use a wireless handset to compose, read or send text messages while operating a motor vehicle on any public street or public highway within the State of Rhode Island.”  The Panel noted that the statute clearly prohibits the reading of text messages, and that such activity would not be captured in the defendant’s text message records from his service provider.  The Panel explained that the trial judge was satisfied with the Trooper’s testimony that the defendant was observed holding and manipulating his cell phone at eye-level while appearing distracted, and reasonably inferred that the defendant did in fact read a text message, in violation of the plain language of the statute.  Accordingly, the Panel sustained the charged violation.

State of Rhode Island v. Jason Kilsey, C.A. No. T13-0056 (March 3, 2014).pdf

Appeals Panel
03/03/2014
State of Rhode Island v. Jason Kilsey, C.A. No. T13-0056 Credibility

Credibility

Defendant appealed the trial judge’s decision to sustain the charged violation of G.L. 1956 § 31-22-30, “Text Messaging While Operating a Motor Vehicle.”  Defendant claimed that the trial judge’s decision was an abuse of discretion because the judge favored the testimony of the charging Trooper over the testimony of defendant.  At trial, the Trooper testified that on Route 95 at 12:15 a.m. he pulled alongside the driver’s side of defendant’s vehicle and observed defendant holding his cell phone at eye-level while manipulating the text message screen, which was illuminated in plain view.  The Trooper further testified that defendant, while holding the cell phone, abruptly swerved in and out of the lane of travel.  The defendant testified that the Trooper mistook his Mini Cooper’s interior “mood lighting” as illumination from a cell phone.  The Panel explained that it will not substitute its judgment of witness credibility for that of the trial judge.  The Panel noted that the trial judge was satisfied by the Trooper’s testimony that he observed the defendant at close range handling a cell phone and manipulating its screen at eye-level.  Accordingly, the Panel sustained the charged violation.

State of Rhode Island v. Jason Kilsey, C.A. No. T13-0056 (March 3, 2014).pdf