RI District Court and Traffic Tribunal Case Law

This website is in no way affiliated with, sponsored by, or supported by the Rhode Island Judiciary, the Rhode Island District Court, or Rhode Island Traffic Tribunal.

Town of South Kingstown v. Frederick Channing, C.A. T.10-0060 (December 8, 2010)

Town of South Kingstown v. Frederick Channing, C.A. T.10-0060 (December 8, 2010).pdf
Appeals Panel
12/08/2010
Town of South Kingstown v. Frederick Channing, C.A. No. 10-0060 Trial Procedure

Procedure

Defendant appealed the decision of the trial judge sustaining the violation of R.I.G.L. 1956 § 31-14-2 (prima facie limits). The Court held that the defendant was not prejudiced by the trial judge’s decision to proceed with the trial despite the defendant’s request for a continuance. The record did not show any abuse of discretion by the trial court when he denied the continuance, as defendant neither made a timely motion nor did he gave a compelling reason that showed the abuse of discretion by denying a continuance. Accordingly, the Court sustained the violation against the defendanat.

Town of South Kingstown v. Frederick Channing, C.A. T.10-0060 (December 8, 2010).pdf

Appeals Panel
12/08/2010
Town of South Kingstown v. Frederick Channing, C.A. No. T10-0060 Radar Calibration

Radar/Laser Calibration

Defendant appealed the decision of the trial judge sustaining the violation of R.I.G.L. 1956 § 31-14-2 (prima facie limits). The Court held that the radar evidence presented by the town was sufficient to sustain the charge according to the requirements set in State v. Sprague, 322 A.2d 36, 39-40 (R.I. 1974) because the officer testified that he was trained in the use of the radar unit and that the unit had been calibrated prior to the defendant’s radar reading.  Accordingly, the Court sustained the violation.

Town of South Kingstown v. Frederick Channing, C.A. T.10-0060 (December 8, 2010).pdf