Defendant appealed the decision of the Appeals Panel sustaining the violation of R.I.G.L. § 31-27-2.1 (refusal to submit to a chemical test). The District Court held that the officer’s reading of the Rights for Use at Scene and Station were sufficient to inform the defendant of his right to make a phone call for the purpose of obtaining bail money. Defendant chose not to make a phone call and was denied bail solely upon his inability to post the cash required for his release. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the decision of the Appeals Panel.