Defendant appealed the decision of the trial court sustaining the violation of R.I.G.L. 1956 § 31-27-2.1 (refusal to submit to chemical test). The Court held that the defendant had voluntarily refused to submit to the chemical test even though there was evidence that the defendant had been given some medication because the state met its burden of proving that the defendant was coherent and, further, the state did not have a duty to inquire as to whether an individual is on medication.  Accordingly, the Court sustained the violation.