Defendant appealed the decision of the Appeals Panel reversing the trial magistrate’s decision to dismiss the violations of a  R.I.G.L. 1956 § 31-27-2.1 (refusal to submit to a chemical test) and R.I.G.L. 1956 § 31-17-5 (entering a private road or driveway). The Court held that probable cause to arrest is determined by the totality of the circumstances pursuant to State v. Castro, 891 A.2d 848, 853 (R.I. 2006). Here, the District Court held that the officer had probable cause to arrest because the defendant had bloodshot and watery eyes, slurred speech, emitted an odor of alcohol from his breath, and failed two field sobriety tests. Accordingly, the Court affirmed the decision of the Appeals Panel and remanded the case back to the trial magistrate.