Defendant appealed the decision of the Appeals Panel sustaining the violation of R.I.G.L. 1956 § 31-15-11 (laned roadway). The Court held that an officer is not precluded from issuing a summons if he or she is not present to observe the violation. Here, an off-duty officer observed a violation and another officer who did not observe the violation issued the summons. The Court held that this was appropriate, and accordingly, affirmed the decision of the trial judge sustaining the charge against the defendant.